LaPlata, Md. Tornado of April 28, 2002 Photo Gallery

The photos below correspond with the report released by NAHB Research Center, Housing Performance Assessment Report: F-4 La Plata Tornado of April 28, 2002

A two-story house blown away in Zone 9 and located in the vortex (rated as total destruction)
Figure 6
A two-story house blown away in Zone 9 and located in the vortex (rated as "total destruction")
A house blown away in Zone 5 and located in the vortex (rated as total destruction)
Figure 7
A house blown away in Zone 5 and located in the vortex (rated as "total destruction")
A house blown away located in Zone 5 in the vortex (rated as total destruction)
Figure 8
A house blown away located in Zone 5 in the vortex (rated as "total destruction")
Parts of a house entangled in a tree located in the vortex in Zone 4 (rated as total destruction)
Figure 9
Parts of a house entangled in a tree located in the vortex in Zone 4 (rated as "total destruction")
Damage to buildings in a commercial district of La Plata (just west of Zone 4 in the path of the vortex)
Figure 10
Damage to buildings in a commercial district of La Plata (just west of Zone 4 in the path of the vortex)
Damage to trees at the east end of Zone 4 (note that the electric pole was just replaced)
Figure 11
Damage to trees at the east end of Zone 4 (note that the electric pole was just replaced)
Survival of a small brick veneer home in Zone 4 in the path of the vortex
Figure 12
Survival of a small brick veneer home in Zone 4 in the path of the vortex
Survival of an old two-story home in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex (rated as finish damage only)
Figure 13
Survival of an old two-story home in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex (rated as "finish damage only")
Survival of an older one-story duplex home in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex (note that the diagonal board sheathing attaches to the roof framing)
Figure 14
Survival of an older one-story duplex home in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex (note that the diagonal board sheathing attaches to the roof framing)
Survival of this town house building in the near-to-vortex inflow winds of Zone 4 was marginal in that the roof attachment was severely stressed and some roof sheathing was lost
Figure 15
Survival of this town house building in the near-to-vortex inflow winds of Zone 4 was marginal in that the roof attachment was severely stressed and some roof sheathing was lost (the walls were sheathed with foam sheathing and braced at corners, but party walls located between each dwelling unit for property separation and fire protection purposes probably contributed substantially to the resistance of this building)
Wood members are rarely broken as an initial failure in extreme winds
Figure 16
Wood members are rarely broken as an initial failure in extreme winds
Failure of connections to foundation due, in part, to missing or improperly installed strap anchors (note that a piece of one anchor has sliced deep into the heel of the boot)
Figure 17
Failure of connections to foundation due, in part, to missing or improperly installed strap anchors (note that a piece of one anchor has sliced deep into the heel of the boot)
Foundation block attached to the strap anchor is dislodged and, in other cases, straps were snapped in two
Figure 18
Foundation block attached to the strap anchor is dislodged and, in other cases, straps were snapped in two
Foundation straps not tied to wall bottom plate and spaced too widely
Figure 19
Foundation straps not tied to wall bottom plate and spaced too widely
Failure of proper wall-to-floor connection in two-story home rated as totally destroyed located in the path of the vortex in Zone 3
Figure 20
Failure of proper wall-to-floor connection in two-story home rated as "totally destroyed" located in the path of the vortex in Zone 3
A one-story house rated as totally destroyed with properly installed toe-nails for truss-to-wall connection
Figure 21
A one-story house rated as "totally destroyed" with properly installed toe-nails for truss-to-wall connection (Zone 3 in the vortex)
Proper toe-nail connection of rafter-to-wall (house was totally destroyed)
Figure 22
Proper toe-nail connection of rafter-to-wall (house was "totally destroyed")
Damage to roof with properly installed tie straps on home in Zone 8 in the near-to-vortex inflow wind (building rated as partial collapse)
Figure 23
Damage to roof with properly installed tie straps on home in Zone 8 in the near-to-vortex inflow wind (building rated as "partial collapse")
Damage to correctly fastened rafter-to-ridge board connection (Zone 3, in the vortex)
Figure 24
Damage to correctly fastened rafter-to-ridge board connection (Zone 3, in the vortex)
Staples properly installed in a blown-off piece of plywood roof sheathing (overall house damage was rated as partial roof loss)
Figure 25
Staples properly installed in a blown-off piece of plywood roof sheathing (overall house damage was rated as "partial roof loss")
Roof uplifted from walls and walls collapsed outward on a home in Zone 10 located in the path of the vortex (note the broken chimney and the mattress still in the bedroom)
Figure 26
Roof uplifted from walls and walls collapsed outward on a home in Zone 10 located in the path of the vortex (note the broken chimney and the mattress still in the bedroom)
Upper story walls and roof uplifted from 2nd story floor deck. Engineered rim board on end of engineered I-joists is also torn off due, at least in part, to connection issues associated with the use of these materials
Figure 27
Upper story walls and roof uplifted from 2nd story floor deck. Engineered rim board on end of engineered I-joists is also torn off due, at least in part, to connection issues associated with the use of these materials
Complete roof loss in Zone 9 on one-story home in the path of the vortex (note the absence of damage to walls except a blunt impact between the double windows)
Figure 28
Complete roof loss in Zone 9 on one-story home in the path of the vortex (note the absence of damage to walls except a blunt impact between the double windows)
Front elevation of case study house with damage rated as partially collapsed (see rear elevation). This house was just completed and not sold. It was located in Zone 8 in the inflow winds within 150 feet of the vortex
Figure 29
Front elevation of case study house with damage rated as "partially collapsed" (see rear elevation). This house was just completed and not sold. It was located in Zone 8 in the inflow winds within 150 feet of the vortex
Rear elevation of case study house
Figure 30
Rear elevation of case study house
Wind indexed by 90-pound bag of cement rolled along ground for a distance of about 30 feet as the tornado passed near by
Figure 31
Wind indexed by 90-pound bag of cement rolled along ground for a distance of about 30 feet as the tornado passed near by
Gable end wall blow-out which might have been mitigated by lapping of the interior wall top plate with the exterior wall top plate (hidden from view)
Figure 32
Gable end wall blow-out which might have been mitigated by lapping of the interior wall top plate with the exterior wall top plate (hidden from view)
This home, while similar to the case study home, was in the vortex in Zone 2 and suffered a greater degree of damage (especially racking) though it is still essentially standing (perhaps due in part to the contributing strength of the brick veneer which was also severely damaged though still in place)
Figure 33
This home, while similar to the case study home, was in the vortex in Zone 2 and suffered a greater degree of damage (especially racking) though it is still essentially standing (perhaps due in part to the contributing strength of the brick veneer which was also severely damaged though still in place)
Debris damage from tree limb penetrating the wall (7/16-inch OSB panel bracing at corner under siding)
Figure 34
Debris damage from tree limb penetrating the wall (7/16" OSB panel bracing at corner under siding)
Debris damage to wall from a blunt impact (foam insulation board under aluminum siding)
Figure 35
Debris damage to wall from a blunt impact (foam insulation board under aluminum siding)
Severe debris damage from a multitude of small projectiles which broke all windows but where not observed to penetrate walls. Debris source was crushed rock from a nearby railroad track (Zone 4, in vortex)
Figure 36
Severe debris damage from a multitude of small projectiles which broke all windows but where not observed to penetrate walls. Debris source was crushed rock from a nearby railroad track (Zone 4, in vortex)
Section of wall (center foreground) thrown a few hundred feet from source building (center background) in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex
Figure 37
Section of wall (center foreground) thrown a few hundred feet from source building (center background) in Zone 4 located in the path of the vortex
Damage to block wall with sill plate still attached but the rest of the building blown away. (The eccentric load path created by sill strap is evident and may have contributed to wall detachment from the foundation)
Figure 38
Damage to block wall with sill plate still attached but the rest of the building blown away. (The eccentric load path created by sill strap is evident and may have contributed to wall detachment from the foundation)
Concrete foundation wall torn apart and building blown away
Figure 39
Concrete foundation wall torn apart and building blown away
House shifted about 6 feet off block foundation in Zone 4, but house is intact. The house was fully sheathed with board sheathing that laps to roof framing (opposite side of home experienced greater damage primarily from debris impacts)
Figure 40
House shifted about 6 feet off block foundation in Zone 4, but house is intact. The house was fully sheathed with board sheathing that laps to roof framing (opposite side of home experienced greater damage primarily from debris impacts)
Demonstration of structural redundancy of wood frame house - floor is still supported though main bearing wall is gone. This degree of redundancy in gravity load resistance, however, is not necessarily present in resistance to wind uplift. (Note the large oak tree heaved up and strewn several feet across the yard)
Figure 41
Demonstration of structural redundancy of wood frame house - floor is still supported though main bearing wall is gone. This degree of redundancy in gravity load resistance, however, is not necessarily present in resistance to wind uplift. (Note the large oak tree heaved up and strewn several feet across the yard)

Back to top